Comparison

Frutto mitme puuvilja mahl vs Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika

Overall, Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFrutto mitme puuvilja mahlHydrate, rabarberi ja maasik...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 20 kcal 17 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 5 g 4.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives23
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has 16% less sugar (4.2 g vs 5 g).
  • Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Frutto mitme puuvilja mahl

Vesi, suhkur, mango - (4%) ja virsikupüree (3%) kontsentreeritud püreedest, õuna - (2%) ja greibimahl (1%) kontsentreeritud mahladest, hape (sidrunhape), lõhna - ja maitseained, vitamiin C vitamiin E, beetakaroteen, magusaine (aspartaam). Sisaldab fenüülalaniini allikat.

Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika

allikavesi, fruktoos, happesuse regulaatorid (sidrunhape), vitamiinid (D3, E, niatsiin, foolhape, B12, biotiin, pantoneenhape), mineraalid (tsink, vask), rabarberi maitseaine, maasika maitseaine, värvaine (lükopeen), stabilisaator (pektiin).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Frutto mitme puuvilja mahl or Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika?

Overall, Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons