Maasika&Laimi maitseline jook vs Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika
Overall, Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Maasika&Laimi maitseline jook
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maasika&Laimi maitseline joo... | Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasik... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has 53% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 36 kcal).
- Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has 51% less sugar (4.2 g vs 8.6 g).
- Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Maasika&Laimi maitseline jook
Vesi, suhkur, kontsentreeritud alkoholivaba kääritatud õunamahl, õunamahlakontsentraat, süsihappegaas, kääritatud õunamahl, hape - õunhape, looduslik lõhna - ja maitseaine, säilitusaine E202, toiduvärv-E163.
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika
allikavesi, fruktoos, happesuse regulaatorid (sidrunhape), vitamiinid (D3, E, niatsiin, foolhape, B12, biotiin, pantoneenhape), mineraalid (tsink, vask), rabarberi maitseaine, maasika maitseaine, värvaine (lükopeen), stabilisaator (pektiin).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maasika&Laimi maitseline jook or Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika?
Overall, Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 36 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.