Comparison

Coca-Cola original taste vs Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl

Overall, Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCoca-Cola original tasteMaasika - sidruni - piparmün...
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 42 kcal 33 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 10.6 g 7.6 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives31
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has 21% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 42 kcal).
  • Coca-Cola original taste has no fat, while Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has 0.5 g.
  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has 28% less sugar (7.6 g vs 10.6 g).
  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Coca-Cola original taste

Vesi, suhkur, süsihappegaas, toiduvärv E 150d, hape: fosforhape, looduslikud lõhna - ja maitseained, kofeiin.

Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl

Õunamahl (78%), maasikapüree (15%), sidrunimahl (7%), piparmünt (0,3%), antioksüdant askorbiinhape.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coca-Cola original taste or Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl?

Overall, Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons