Comparison

Mental performance vs Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl

Overall, Mental performance has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMental performanceMaasika - sidruni - piparmün...
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 20 kcal 33 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat — 0 g
Sugars 4.8 g 7.6 g
Salt — 0.2 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mental performance has 39% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 33 kcal).
  • Mental performance has no fat, while Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has 0.5 g.
  • Mental performance has 37% less sugar (4.8 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Mental performance

Vesi; suhkur; fruktoos (1,7%); happesuse regulaatorid - sidrun - ja õunhape; mineraalid* (magneesiumtsitraat, kaltsiumglükonaatlaktaat); vitamiinid (C-, B12-, D-vitamiinid, pantoteenhape, biotiin, niatsiin); pohla lõhna - ja maitseaine ning looduslik tee lõhna - ja maitseaine; taimne värviekstrakt õunast, melassist ja hibiskusest; toiduvärv - karmiin; säilitusaine - naatriumbensoaat.

Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl

Õunamahl (78%), maasikapüree (15%), sidrunimahl (7%), piparmünt (0,3%), antioksüdant askorbiinhape.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mental performance or Maasika - sidruni - piparmündi mahl?

Overall, Mental performance has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mental performance has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mental performance has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 7.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons