Classic chickenSteaks vs Panés poulet
Overall, Classic chickenSteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Classic chickenSteaks | Panés poulet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Classic chickenSteaks has 13% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 209 kcal).
- Classic chickenSteaks has 16% less fat (8.4 g vs 10 g).
- Classic chickenSteaks has 37% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Panés poulet has 57% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Classic chickenSteaks has 51% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Classic chickenSteaks has 12% more protein (14.7 g vs 13 g).
- Classic chickenSteaks has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Classic chickenSteaks lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Classic chickenSteaks
chicken breast (56%), wheatflour, (gluten, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), water, rapeseed oil, wheat protein,, wheat starch, salt, Durum wheat semolina, wheat gluten, rice flour, yeast, dried spirit vinegar, dried garlic, dried onions, sugar, yeast extract, dried lemon herb extract, spice extract, ground white pepper, dried sage
Panés poulet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Classic chickenSteaks or Panés poulet?
Overall, Classic chickenSteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Classic chickenSteaks has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panés poulet has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.