Comparison

Classic chickenSteaks vs Cotolette di pollo

Overall, Classic chickenSteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientClassic chickenSteaksCotolette di pollo
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 181 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 8.4 g 8.9 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 1.2 g
Sugars 1.8 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.6 g 1.5 g
Fiber 1.6 g 0 g
Protein 14.7 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Classic chickenSteaks has 13% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Classic chickenSteaks has 27% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Cotolette di pollo has 51% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Classic chickenSteaks has 57% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Classic chickenSteaks has 100% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Classic chickenSteaks has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Classic chickenSteaks lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Classic chickenSteaks

chicken breast (56%), wheatflour, (gluten, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), water, rapeseed oil, wheat protein,, wheat starch, salt, Durum wheat semolina, wheat gluten, rice flour, yeast, dried spirit vinegar, dried garlic, dried onions, sugar, yeast extract, dried lemon herb extract, spice extract, ground white pepper, dried sage

Cotolette di pollo

Filetti di pollo 54%, Farina di , Acqua, Olio di semi di girasole, , Sale, Spezie, Amido di , Lievito, ascorbato di sodio, Aromi

FAQ

Which is healthier: Classic chickenSteaks or Cotolette di pollo?

Overall, Classic chickenSteaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Classic chickenSteaks has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cotolette di pollo has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons