Comparison
Cinnamon Roll vs Dalchini
Overall, Dalchini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinnamon Roll | Dalchini |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 10.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.2 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 25.9 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 12.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dalchini has 35% less fat (10.4 g vs 16 g).
- Dalchini has 47% less saturated fat (4.8 g vs 9.2 g).
- Dalchini has 87% less sugar (2.1 g vs 16 g).
- Dalchini has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Dalchini has 86% more fiber (25.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- Dalchini has 65% more protein (12.3 g vs 4.3 g).
Ingredients
Cinnamon Roll
Not available.
Dalchini
Cassia (dalchini)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinnamon Roll or Dalchini?
Overall, Dalchini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cinnamon Roll has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dalchini has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 16 g per 100 g.