Comparison
Kanel vs Dalchini
Overall, Kanel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kanel | Dalchini |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 10.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 53.1 g | 25.9 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 12.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kanel has 61% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 345 kcal).
- Kanel has 88% less fat (1.2 g vs 10.4 g).
- Kanel has 91% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 4.8 g).
- Kanel has 51% more fiber (53.1 g vs 25.9 g).
- Dalchini has 69% more protein (12.3 g vs 3.9 g).
Ingredients
Kanel
Kanel.
Dalchini
Cassia (dalchini)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kanel or Dalchini?
Overall, Kanel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kanel has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dalchini has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.