Comparison
Kanel vs Canela en rama
Overall, Canela en rama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kanel | Canela en rama |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 53.1 g | — |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Canela en rama has no calories, while Kanel has 136 kcal.
- Canela en rama has no fat, while Kanel has 1.2 g.
- Canela en rama has no saturated fat, while Kanel has 0.4 g.
- Canela en rama has no sugar, while Kanel has 2.2 g.
- Kanel has 74% more protein (3.9 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Kanel
Kanel.
Canela en rama
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kanel or Canela en rama?
Overall, Canela en rama has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Canela en rama has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Canela en rama has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.