Chutney de tomate vs Chips gesalzen
Overall, Chutney de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chutney de tomate | Chips gesalzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 539 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chutney de tomate has 75% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 539 kcal).
- Chutney de tomate has 97% less fat (0.9 g vs 34 g).
- Chutney de tomate has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Chips gesalzen has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Chutney de tomate has no salt, while Chips gesalzen has 1.2 g.
- Chutney de tomate has 63% more protein (16.1 g vs 6 g).
- Chutney de tomate has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chutney de tomate
Not available.
Chips gesalzen
Kartoffeln 65 %, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen). Speisesalz 1,2 % Kann Spuren von Milch enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chutney de tomate or Chips gesalzen?
Overall, Chutney de tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chutney de tomate has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 539 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips gesalzen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.