Comparison

Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl

Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoux de BruxellesRosenkohl
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 39 kcal 44 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 2.4 g 2.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 3.9 g 3.8 g
Protein 2.9 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choux de Bruxelles has 11% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 44 kcal).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 85% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has no saturated fat, while Rosenkohl has 0.3 g.
  • Rosenkohl has 17% more protein (3.5 g vs 2.9 g).

Ingredients

Choux de Bruxelles

100% choux de Bruxelles.

Rosenkohl

Rosenkohl

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choux de Bruxelles or Rosenkohl?

Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choux de Bruxelles has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choux de Bruxelles has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons