Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl
Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choux de Bruxelles | Rosenkohl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Choux de Bruxelles has 11% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Choux de Bruxelles has 85% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Choux de Bruxelles has no saturated fat, while Rosenkohl has 0.3 g.
- Rosenkohl has 17% more protein (3.5 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Choux de Bruxelles
100% choux de Bruxelles.
Rosenkohl
Rosenkohl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choux de Bruxelles or Rosenkohl?
Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Choux de Bruxelles has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choux de Bruxelles has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.