Comparison
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl
Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choux de Bruxelles | Rosenkohl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Choux de Bruxelles has 12% more fiber (4.3 g vs 3.8 g).
Ingredients
Choux de Bruxelles
Chou de Bruxelles
Rosenkohl
Rosenkohl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choux de Bruxelles or Rosenkohl?
Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Choux de Bruxelles has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choux de Bruxelles has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Choux de bruxelles sache... vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux De Bruxelles, 1 Ki... vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Iglo Field Fresh Spruitj...
Choux de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de bruxelles sache... vs Rosenkohl
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl
Choux De Bruxelles, 1 Ki... vs Rosenkohl