Comparison
Chou-fleur à croquer vs Fleurette chou-fleur
Overall, Chou-fleur à croquer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou-fleur à croquer | Fleurette chou-fleur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou-fleur à croquer has 23% more protein (2.6 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Chou-fleur à croquer
Chou-fleur
Fleurette chou-fleur
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou-fleur à croquer or Fleurette chou-fleur?
Overall, Chou-fleur à croquer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fleurette chou-fleur has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chou-fleur à croquer has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.