Comparison
Chou-fleur à croquer vs Blumenkohl
Overall, Chou-fleur à croquer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou-fleur à croquer | Blumenkohl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou-fleur à croquer has no fat, while Blumenkohl has 0.3 g.
- Blumenkohl has 23% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Chou-fleur à croquer has no salt, while Blumenkohl has 0.3 g.
- Chou-fleur à croquer has 27% more protein (2.6 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Chou-fleur à croquer
Chou-fleur
Blumenkohl
Blumenkohl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou-fleur à croquer or Blumenkohl?
Overall, Chou-fleur à croquer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blumenkohl has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blumenkohl has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.