Comparison

Chocolate mini wafer squares vs Kitkat crunchy

Overall, Chocolate mini wafer squares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolate mini wafer squaresKitkat crunchy
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 520 kcal 516 kcal
Fat 27.5 g 27 g
Saturated fat 24.5 g 15.1 g
Sugars 36.5 g 45.2 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 3.6 g 2.3 g
Protein 6 g 6.5 g
Additives52
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kitkat crunchy has 38% less saturated fat (15.1 g vs 24.5 g).
  • Chocolate mini wafer squares has 19% less sugar (36.5 g vs 45.2 g).
  • Chocolate mini wafer squares has 36% more fiber (3.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Only Chocolate mini wafer squares lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocolate mini wafer squares

Sweetener: E965 · Wheatflour (contains Gluten) · Coconut Oil · Fat Reduced Cocoa Powder · Emulsifier: Soya Lecithin · Salt · Raising Agent: Sodium Bicarbonate · Vanilla Extract.

Kitkat crunchy

Azúcar, harina de TRIGO, LECHE desnatada en polvo, grasas vegetales (palma, shea), manteca de cacao, pasta de cacao', jarabe de glucosa, suero de la LECHE filtrado en polvo, grasa LÁCTEA anhidra, cacao desgrasado en polvo', emulgente (lecitinas), gasificante (carbonatos de sodio). aroma natural. Puede contener CACAHUETES FRUTOS DE CASCARA. 'Rainforest Alliance Certified. Find out more at ra.org

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolate mini wafer squares or Kitkat crunchy?

Overall, Chocolate mini wafer squares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kitkat crunchy has fewer calories: 516 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolate mini wafer squares has less sugar: 36.5 g versus 45.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons