Comparison

Chocolate Cognac vs Baton crema rom

Overall, Baton crema rom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolate CognacBaton crema rom
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 467 kcal 471 kcal
Fat 23 g 23.3 g
Saturated fat 14 g 8 g
Sugars 57 g 55.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 1.5 g
Protein 4.5 g 3.7 g
Additives14
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Soybeans, Lapte

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Baton crema rom has 43% less saturated fat (8 g vs 14 g).
  • Baton crema rom has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Chocolate Cognac has 18% more protein (4.5 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Only Chocolate Cognac lists: Gluten, Nuts.
  • Only Baton crema rom lists: Lapte.

Ingredients

Chocolate Cognac

Zucker, Kakaobutter, Vollmilchpulver, Cognac (8%), Kakaomasse, Milchzucker, Invertzucker, Magermilchpulver, Verdickungsmittel (Gummi arabicum), Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Gerstenmalzextrakt, Aroma Vanillin. Kann Haselnüsse und andere Schalenfrüchte enthalten.

Baton crema rom

zahăr, grăsimi vegetale parțial hidrogenate (_soia_, palmier, shea, rapiță), pudră de cacao cu conținut redus de grăsime, sirop de glucoză, derivat din zer pudră (din _lapte_), agent de umezire (sirop de sorbitol), alcool etilic rafinat, _lapte_ praf parțial degresat, rom 0,1%, stabilizator (Invertază), emulsifianți (lecitină din _soia_, poliricinoleat de poliglicerină), arome

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolate Cognac or Baton crema rom?

Overall, Baton crema rom has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolate Cognac has fewer calories: 467 kcal versus 471 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Baton crema rom has less sugar: 55.1 g versus 57 g per 100 g.

More comparisons