Comparison

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go vs Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena

Overall, Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientChocolat Banane Nilk2GoBebida de zumo de frutas y a...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 50 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1 g
Sugars 4.6 g 9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.7 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.9 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 24% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 66 kcal).
  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 58% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 49% less sugar (4.6 g vs 9 g).
  • Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go

Eau, avoine (10 %), purée de banane" (7%), cacao* (1,4 %), huile de tournesol", épaississant: gomme de Guar", sel de mer, extrait de vanille bourbon, épaississant: gellan, correcteur d'acidité: carbonate de çalcium. * issu de l'agriculture biologique.

Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena

Licuado de avena (43%) (30%), zumo de piña, zumo de uva, puré de Coco (5%), zumo de limón, extracto de alga kombu, fibra, aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go or Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena?

Overall, Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons