Chips salées extra craquantes vs Chips
Overall, Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips salées extra craquante... | Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 528 kcal | 567 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 37.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 4.2 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips salées extra craquantes has 18% less fat (31 g vs 37.6 g).
- Chips salées extra craquantes has 26% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Chips has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Chips has 64% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Chips salées extra craquantes has 30% more protein (6.1 g vs 4.3 g).
- Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips salées extra craquantes
Not available.
Chips
Pomme de terre, huile de tournesol, sel marin de Noirmoutier
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips salées extra craquantes or Chips?
Overall, Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips salées extra craquantes has fewer calories: 528 kcal versus 567 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.