Comparison
Chips vs Anglesey sea salt crisps
Overall, Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips | Anglesey sea salt crisps |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 567 kcal | 532 kcal |
| Fat | 37.6 g | 30.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Anglesey sea salt crisps has 18% less fat (30.7 g vs 37.6 g).
- Chips has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Chips has 57% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chips has 10% more fiber (3.9 g vs 3.5 g).
- Anglesey sea salt crisps has 16% more protein (5.1 g vs 4.3 g).
- Chips has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips
Pomme de terre, huile de tournesol, sel marin de Noirmoutier
Anglesey sea salt crisps
Pommes de terre,huile de tournesol,sel de mer Anglesey aop
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips or Anglesey sea salt crisps?
Overall, Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Anglesey sea salt crisps has fewer calories: 532 kcal versus 567 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Hand Cooked Lightly Salt... vs Anglesey sea salt crisps
Anglesey sea salt crisps vs Lättsaltade
Anglesey sea salt crisps vs Saltade
Geriffelte Chips Salz vs Anglesey sea salt crisps
Chips salées extra craqu... vs Anglesey sea salt crisps
Salt & Vinegar vs Anglesey sea salt crisps
Chips vs Hand Cooked Lightly Salt...
Chips vs Lättsaltade