Chilli Kabanossu vs Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska
Overall, Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chilli Kabanossu | Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 490 kcal | 212 kcal |
| Fat | 41 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 7.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has 57% fewer calories (212 kcal vs 490 kcal).
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has 73% less fat (11 g vs 41 g).
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has 74% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 16 g).
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has no sugar, while Chilli Kabanossu has 1.9 g.
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has 56% less salt (3.4 g vs 7.8 g).
- Chilli Kabanossu has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has 11% more protein (28 g vs 25 g).
- Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chilli Kabanossu lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Chilli Kabanossu
Pork, Potato Starch, Salt, Spices (including 1% Chilli), Spice Extracts, Flavourings, Pork Protein, Glucose, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate; Preservative: Sodium Nitrite; Edible Alginate Casing (Gelling Agent: Sodium Alginate; Stabilisers: Cellulose, Calcium Chloride). Filled into Edible Alginate Casings. Made with 185g of pork per 100g of finished product. Allergy Advice May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts and Soya
Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska
mięso wieprzowe, mięso wołowe (100 g produktu wytworzono ze 127 g mięsa wieprzowego 14 g mięsa wołowego), sól, przyprawy, przeciwutleniacze: cytrynian sodu, askorbinian sodu, substancja konserwująca: azotyn sodu.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chilli Kabanossu or Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska?
Overall, Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has fewer calories: 212 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kiełbasa sucha Krakowska has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.