Comparison

Chilli Kabanossu vs Käse-Cabanossi

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChilli KabanossuKäse-Cabanossi
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 490 kcal 483 kcal
Fat 41 g 41 g
Saturated fat 16 g 18 g
Sugars 1.9 g 1.5 g
Salt 7.8 g 3.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 25 g 27 g
Additives53
AllergensPorkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chilli Kabanossu has 11% less saturated fat (16 g vs 18 g).
  • Käse-Cabanossi has 21% less sugar (1.5 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Käse-Cabanossi has 59% less salt (3.2 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Chilli Kabanossu has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Chilli Kabanossu lists: Pork.
  • Only Käse-Cabanossi lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chilli Kabanossu

Pork, Potato Starch, Salt, Spices (including 1% Chilli), Spice Extracts, Flavourings, Pork Protein, Glucose, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate; Preservative: Sodium Nitrite; Edible Alginate Casing (Gelling Agent: Sodium Alginate; Stabilisers: Cellulose, Calcium Chloride). Filled into Edible Alginate Casings. Made with 185g of pork per 100g of finished product. Allergy Advice May contain Celery, Milk, Mustard, Nuts and Soya

Käse-Cabanossi

Schweinefleisch, Emmentaler, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit), Gewürze, Stabilisator: Natriumcitrate; Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure; Gewürzextrakte, essbare Wursthülle (Rinderkollagen), Buchenholzrauch. Dieses Produkt ist von Natur aus glutenfrei.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chilli Kabanossu or Käse-Cabanossi?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Käse-Cabanossi has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Käse-Cabanossi has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons