Chataka Pataka vs Munchy masala
Overall, Munchy masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chataka Pataka | Munchy masala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 514 kcal | 468 kcal |
| Fat | 24.8 g | 17.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 4.3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Munchy masala has 29% less fat (17.7 g vs 24.8 g).
- Munchy masala has 64% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 12 g).
- Chataka Pataka has 33% more fiber (4.8 g vs 3.2 g).
- Chataka Pataka has 21% more protein (7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Munchy masala has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chataka Pataka
RICE MEAL (43%), EDIBLE VEGETABLE OIL (CONTAINS ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWINGS: PALMOLEIN, RICE BRAN, CORN, COTTONSEED), CORN MEAL (13%), CHICKPEA FLOUR, **SEASONING [EDIBLE COMMON SALT, SPICES & CONDIMENTS 2% (CUMIN, CHILLI, BLACK PEPPER, DRY MANGO), DEHYDRATED VEGETABLE POWDER (ONION, GARLIC), SUGAR, ACIDITY REGULATOR (INS 330), ANTICAKING AGENT (INS 551), FLAVOUR ENHANCER (INS 627, INS 631), FLAVOUR (NATURAL & NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES), PAPRIKA EXTRACT (INS 160C)]. **AS FLAVOURING & SEASONING AGENT NAMKEEN READY-TO-EAT SAVOURIES | PROPRIETARY FOOD | INDIAN SNACKS & SAVOURIES PRODUCT OF INDIA
Munchy masala
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chataka Pataka or Munchy masala?
Overall, Munchy masala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Munchy masala has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chataka Pataka has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.