Cereais e Fibra vs Classic Malt
Overall, Cereais e Fibra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cereais e Fibra | Classic Malt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 335 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 5 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Fiber | 21 g | — |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cereais e Fibra has 11% fewer calories (335 kcal vs 377 kcal).
- Cereais e Fibra has 90% less fat (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Cereais e Fibra has 89% less sugar (5 g vs 46 g).
- Classic Malt has 56% more protein (11 g vs 4.8 g).
- Only Cereais e Fibra lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cereais e Fibra
Cevada (31%), _Cevada_ malteada (23%), inulina, chicória (15,5%), _centeio_ (8%), regulador de acidez (E 525).
Classic Malt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cereais e Fibra or Classic Malt?
Overall, Cereais e Fibra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cereais e Fibra has fewer calories: 335 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cereais e Fibra has less sugar: 5 g versus 46 g per 100 g.