Comparison

Mango Trinkmahlzeit vs Classic Malt

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMango TrinkmahlzeitClassic Malt
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 100 kcal 377 kcal
Fat 5 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g —
Sugars 4.6 g 46 g
Salt 0.1 g —
Fiber 1.6 g —
Protein 5.3 g 11 g
Additives50
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mango Trinkmahlzeit has 73% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 377 kcal).
  • Classic Malt has 60% less fat (2 g vs 5 g).
  • Mango Trinkmahlzeit has 90% less sugar (4.6 g vs 46 g).
  • Classic Malt has 52% more protein (11 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Only Mango Trinkmahlzeit lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Mango Trinkmahlzeit

Trinkmilch (1,0% Fett), Wasser, pflanzliche Öle (Raps, Sonnenblume), Milcheiweiß, Mangopüree 3,0%, Kokos milchpulver, glutenfreie Haferfaser, losliche Maisfaser, Vitamine (A, C, D, K. 81, 83, 85, B6, Folsäure), Mineralstoffe (Kalium, Magnesium, Eisen, Zink, Kupfer, Mangan, Selen, Chrom, Molybdän, Jod), Stärke, Maltodextrin, Süßungsmittel: Sucralose; Aromen, Farbstoff: Carotin; Stabilisator: Pektine; Emulgator: Leci - thine; Säureregulatoren: Citronensäure, Natriumcitrate; Laktase.

Classic Malt

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mango Trinkmahlzeit or Classic Malt?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mango Trinkmahlzeit has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mango Trinkmahlzeit has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons