Comparison
Cèpes séchés vs Cueillis en forêt
Overall, Cueillis en forêt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cèpes séchés | Cueillis en forêt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 299 kcal | 313 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 22 g | 22 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cueillis en forêt has 45% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Cèpes séchés
Cèpes séchés Bio (Boletus edulis)
Cueillis en forêt
Cèpes séchés. Les champignons ne proviennent pas de France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cèpes séchés or Cueillis en forêt?
Overall, Cueillis en forêt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cèpes séchés has fewer calories: 299 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cèpes séchés has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Cèpes séchés vs Steinpilze getrocknet
Cueillis en forêt vs Dried Porcini Mushroom C...
Cèpes séchés vs Steinpilze (getrocknet)
Getrocknete Steinpilze vs Cèpes séchés
Cèpes séchés vs Bolets séchés
Cueillis en forêt vs Steinpilze (getrocknet)
Getrocknete Steinpilze vs Cueillis en forêt
Cueillis en forêt vs Bolets séchés