Cueillis en forêt vs Steinpilze (getrocknet)
Overall, Cueillis en forêt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cueillis en forêt | Steinpilze (getrocknet) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 22 g | 17 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steinpilze (getrocknet) has 20% less fat (3.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Cueillis en forêt has 64% less sugar (5 g vs 14 g).
- Cueillis en forêt has 23% more fiber (22 g vs 17 g).
- Cueillis en forêt has 16% more protein (31 g vs 26 g).
Ingredients
Cueillis en forêt
Cèpes séchés. Les champignons ne proviennent pas de France.
Steinpilze (getrocknet)
Luftgetrocknete Steinpilze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cueillis en forêt or Steinpilze (getrocknet)?
Overall, Cueillis en forêt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steinpilze (getrocknet) has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cueillis en forêt has less sugar: 5 g versus 14 g per 100 g.