Comparison

Cueillis en forêt vs Steinpilze getrocknet

Overall, Steinpilze getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Cueillis en forêt	Steinpilze getrocknet
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	—
Calories	313 kcal	162 kcal
Fat	4.5 g	4.3 g
Saturated fat	0.6 g	0.6 g
Sugars	5 g	4.5 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	22 g	—
Protein	31 g	24 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Steinpilze getrocknet has 48% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 313 kcal).
Steinpilze getrocknet has 10% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5 g).
Cueillis en forêt has 23% more protein (31 g vs 24 g).

Ingredients

Cueillis en forêt

Cèpes séchés. Les champignons ne proviennent pas de France.

Steinpilze getrocknet

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cueillis en forêt or Steinpilze getrocknet?

Overall, Steinpilze getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Steinpilze getrocknet has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Steinpilze getrocknet has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Cèpes séchés vs Steinpilze getrocknet Cueillis en forêt vs Dried Porcini Mushroom C... Steinpilze getrocknet vs Dried Porcini Mushroom C... Cueillis en forêt vs Steinpilze (getrocknet) Getrocknete Steinpilze vs Cueillis en forêt Cueillis en forêt vs Bolets séchés Steinpilze (getrocknet) vs Steinpilze getrocknet Getrocknete Steinpilze vs Steinpilze getrocknet