Cèpes séchés vs Steinpilze getrocknet
Overall, Steinpilze getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cèpes séchés | Steinpilze getrocknet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 299 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 22 g | — |
| Protein | 29 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steinpilze getrocknet has 46% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 299 kcal).
- Steinpilze getrocknet has 45% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Cèpes séchés has 17% more protein (29 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Cèpes séchés
Cèpes séchés Bio (Boletus edulis)
Steinpilze getrocknet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cèpes séchés or Steinpilze getrocknet?
Overall, Steinpilze getrocknet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steinpilze getrocknet has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steinpilze getrocknet has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.