Comparison
Cueillis en forêt vs Bolets séchés
Overall, Cueillis en forêt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cueillis en forêt | Bolets séchés |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 306 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 22 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bolets séchés has 33% less fat (3 g vs 4.5 g).
- Cueillis en forêt has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Cueillis en forêt has 71% less sugar (5 g vs 17 g).
- Cueillis en forêt has 92% more fiber (22 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Cueillis en forêt
Cèpes séchés. Les champignons ne proviennent pas de France.
Bolets séchés
bolets
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cueillis en forêt or Bolets séchés?
Overall, Cueillis en forêt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bolets séchés has fewer calories: 306 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cueillis en forêt has less sugar: 5 g versus 17 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Cueillis en forêt vs Dried Porcini Mushroom C...
Cèpes séchés vs Bolets séchés
Dried Porcini Mushroom C... vs Bolets séchés
Cueillis en forêt vs Steinpilze (getrocknet)
Getrocknete Steinpilze vs Cueillis en forêt
Cueillis en forêt vs Steinpilze getrocknet
Steinpilze (getrocknet) vs Bolets séchés
Getrocknete Steinpilze vs Bolets séchés