Cassonade vs Sucre mascobado
Overall, Sucre mascobado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassonade | Sucre mascobado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 98.9 g | 97 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre mascobado has no fat, while Cassonade has 0.5 g.
- Sucre mascobado has no saturated fat, while Cassonade has 0.5 g.
- Cassonade has 60% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Cassonade
100% Sucre Pure Canne
Sucre mascobado
Sucre de canne complet*. *Produit issu du commerce équitable et de l'agriculture biologique (100% du volume total).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassonade or Sucre mascobado?
Overall, Sucre mascobado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre mascobado has fewer calories: 389 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre mascobado has less sugar: 97 g versus 98.9 g per 100 g.