Sucre mascobado vs Sucre complet Muscovado
Overall, Sucre complet Muscovado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre mascobado | Sucre complet Muscovado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 2 |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 394 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 97 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre complet Muscovado has 60% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Sucre mascobado
Sucre de canne complet*. *Produit issu du commerce équitable et de l'agriculture biologique (100% du volume total).
Sucre complet Muscovado
sucre brut de canne issu de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre mascobado or Sucre complet Muscovado?
Overall, Sucre complet Muscovado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre mascobado has fewer calories: 389 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre complet Muscovado has less sugar: 95 g versus 97 g per 100 g.