Sucre complet bio vs Sucre mascobado
Overall, Sucre complet bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre complet bio | Sucre mascobado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 68 g | 97 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre complet bio has 30% less sugar (68 g vs 97 g).
- Sucre complet bio has 83% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Sucre complet bio
Sucre complet de canne issus de l'agriculture biologique
Sucre mascobado
Sucre de canne complet*. *Produit issu du commerce équitable et de l'agriculture biologique (100% du volume total).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre complet bio or Sucre mascobado?
Overall, Sucre complet bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre complet bio has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre complet bio has less sugar: 68 g versus 97 g per 100 g.