Cassonade vs Sucre complet de canne
Overall, Sucre complet de canne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassonade | Sucre complet de canne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 98.9 g | 96 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre complet de canne has no fat, while Cassonade has 0.5 g.
- Sucre complet de canne has no saturated fat, while Cassonade has 0.5 g.
- Cassonade has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Sucre complet de canne lists: None.
Ingredients
Cassonade
100% Sucre Pure Canne
Sucre complet de canne
Sucre complet de canne
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassonade or Sucre complet de canne?
Overall, Sucre complet de canne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre complet de canne has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre complet de canne has less sugar: 96 g versus 98.9 g per 100 g.