Sucre complet bio vs Sucre complet de canne
Overall, Sucre complet bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre complet bio | Sucre complet de canne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 384 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 68 g | 96 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre complet bio has 29% less sugar (68 g vs 96 g).
- Sucre complet bio has 100% more protein (1.2 g vs 0 g).
- Only Sucre complet de canne lists: None.
Ingredients
Sucre complet bio
Sucre complet de canne issus de l'agriculture biologique
Sucre complet de canne
Sucre complet de canne
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre complet bio or Sucre complet de canne?
Overall, Sucre complet bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucre complet de canne has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre complet bio has less sugar: 68 g versus 96 g per 100 g.