Comparison

Cassonade vs Sucre Roux en morceaux

Overall, Sucre Roux en morceaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Cassonade	Sucre Roux en morceaux
Nutri-Score	e	e
NOVA group	2	2
Calories	400 kcal	400 kcal
Fat	0.5 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0.5 g	0 g
Sugars	98.9 g	100 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0 g	0 g
Protein	0.5 g	0 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Sucre Roux en morceaux has no fat, while Cassonade has 0.5 g.
Sucre Roux en morceaux has no saturated fat, while Cassonade has 0.5 g.
Cassonade has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Cassonade

100% Sucre Pure Canne

Sucre Roux en morceaux

Sucre de canne, sucre de canne caramélisé,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cassonade or Sucre Roux en morceaux?

Overall, Sucre Roux en morceaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cassonade has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cassonade has less sugar: 98.9 g versus 100 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Cassonade vs Sucre de canne complet D... Sucre Roux en morceaux vs Sucre de canne complet D... Sucre complet bio vs Sucre Roux en morceaux Sucre Roux en morceaux vs Sucre complet Muscovado Sucre Roux en morceaux vs Sucre De Canne Le Blond Cassonade vs Sucre complet de canne Sucre Roux en morceaux vs Sucre complet de canne Cassonade vs Sucre mascobado