Cassis vs Cola
Overall, Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassis | Cola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.8 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola has 56% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Cola has 58% less sugar (4.6 g vs 10.8 g).
- Cola has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassis
Water, suiker, 5% zwarte bessensap uit sapconcentraat, 4% gefermenteerd zwarte bessensapconcentraat koolzuur, voedingszuur: citroenzuur; aroma, conserveermiddel kaliumsorbaat.
Cola
ماء غازي، سكر، محمض : E330، نكهة، محليات : E955 E950، كافيين
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassis or Cola?
Overall, Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.