Cola vs Cassis
Overall, Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cola | Cassis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola has 29% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- Cola has 30% less sugar (4.6 g vs 6.5 g).
- Cola has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cola
ماء غازي، سكر، محمض : E330، نكهة، محليات : E955 E950، كافيين
Cassis
Koolzuurhoudend water, suiker, zwarte bessensap uit concentraat (3%), gefermeteerd bessensap (2%), voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma, kleurend concentraat (zwarte bes, wortel,conserveermiddel (kaliumsorbaat), zoetstof (cyclamaten, acesulfaam-K, sucralose).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cola or Cassis?
Overall, Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.