Cassis vs Cassis
Overall, Cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Cassis | Cassis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.8 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassis has 38% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Cassis has 40% less sugar (6.5 g vs 10.8 g).
Ingredients
Cassis
Water, suiker, 5% zwarte bessensap uit sapconcentraat, 4% gefermenteerd zwarte bessensapconcentraat koolzuur, voedingszuur: citroenzuur; aroma, conserveermiddel kaliumsorbaat.
Cassis
Koolzuurhoudend water, suiker, zwarte bessensap uit concentraat (3%), gefermeteerd bessensap (2%), voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma, kleurend concentraat (zwarte bes, wortel,conserveermiddel (kaliumsorbaat), zoetstof (cyclamaten, acesulfaam-K, sucralose).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassis or Cassis?
Overall, Cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassis has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassis has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.