Carpaccio grand cru de charal vs Les Grignot - Mini Travers de Porc Tex Mex
Overall, Carpaccio grand cru de charal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Carpaccio grand cru de charal
Les Grignot - Mini Travers de Porc Tex Mex
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio grand cru de chara... | Les Grignot - Mini Travers d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 287 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 23.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 9.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 18.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 19% fewer calories (233 kcal vs 287 kcal).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 31% less fat (16 g vs 23.3 g).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 71% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 9.7 g).
- Les Grignot - Mini Travers de Porc Tex Mex has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has 78% less salt (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Carpaccio grand cru de charal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Carpaccio grand cru de charal lists: Milk, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Carpaccio grand cru de charal
Carpaccio mariné 83,4% : viande bovine 92%, marinade épicée 8% (huile de colza, arômes, colorant : extrait de paprika). Dosette de marinade 8,3% (huile d'olive 50%, vinaigre balsamique 30% (vinaigre de vin, moût de raisin, colorant : caramel, _sulfites_), huile de colza, eau, vinaigre, graines de _sésame_ 3%, sel, arômes, dosettes de copeaux de parmesan (_lait_) 8,3%.
Les Grignot - Mini Travers de Porc Tex Mex
Travers de porc 93,6% - marinade tex mex 2% (épices - chapelure de riz - dextrose - arômes naturels - plantes aromatiques) - sel de Guérande
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio grand cru de charal or Les Grignot - Mini Travers de Porc Tex Mex?
Overall, Carpaccio grand cru de charal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio grand cru de charal has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Les Grignot - Mini Travers de Porc Tex Mex has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.