Comparison
Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g vs Cardon
Overall, Cardon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g | Cardon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g has no fat, while Cardon has 0.5 g.
- Cardon has no sugar, while Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g has 1.1 g.
- Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Cardon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g
cardon, eau, sel, acide ascorbique.
Cardon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cardons, Le Bocal, 660g or Cardon?
Overall, Cardon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cardon has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cardon has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.