Comparison
Cardons vs Cardon
Overall, Cardon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cardons | Cardon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cardon has 37% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 19 kcal).
- Cardons has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Cardon has no sugar, while Cardons has 1.5 g.
- Cardon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cardons
Cardon, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique (E330) et antioxydant : acide ascorbique (E300).
Cardon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cardons or Cardon?
Overall, Cardon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cardon has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cardon has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.