Carciofi alla griglia vs Artichaud aux fines herbes
Overall, Carciofi alla griglia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carciofi alla griglia | Artichaud aux fines herbes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carciofi alla griglia has 29% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 114 kcal).
- Carciofi alla griglia has 52% less fat (4.8 g vs 10 g).
- Carciofi alla griglia has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Artichaud aux fines herbes has 48% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.3 g).
- Carciofi alla griglia has 81% less salt (0.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Carciofi alla griglia has 18% more fiber (4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Carciofi alla griglia has 27% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Carciofi alla griglia has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Carciofi alla griglia lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Carciofi alla griglia
Carciofi (contiene SOLFITI) 89,7%, olio di semi di girasole, sale, pepe nero.
Artichaud aux fines herbes
Artichauts coupés 60%, huile de graines de tournesol, vinaigre de vin, sel, persil, ail, basilic.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carciofi alla griglia or Artichaud aux fines herbes?
Overall, Carciofi alla griglia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carciofi alla griglia has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Artichaud aux fines herbes has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.