Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers vs Hamburger di Pollo
Overall, Hamburger di Pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers
Hamburger di Pollo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caramelized Onion & Aged Whi... | Hamburger di Pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 132 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 7.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger di Pollo has 13% fewer calories (132 kcal vs 152 kcal).
- Hamburger di Pollo has 12% less fat (7.1 g vs 8 g).
- Hamburger di Pollo has 22% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Hamburger di Pollo has no sugar, while Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers has 0.9 g.
- Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers
Organic Chicken, Organic White Cheddar Cheese (Pasteurized Organic _Milk_, Cheese Cultures, Sea Salt, Vegetable Enzymes), Organic Caramelized Onions (Organic Onions, Organic Extra Virgin Olive Oil), Organic Red Peppers, Sea Salt, Organic Evaporated Cane Sugar, Vinegar, Organic Spices, Organic Extract of Rosemary, Organic Garlic
Hamburger di Pollo
92% carne di pollo, acqua, patate, fibra di patate, sale, aromi, rosmarino, concentrato di barbabietola, antiossidante: acido ascorbico. Può contenere tracce di: Latte, uova.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caramelized Onion & Aged White Cheddar Charbroiled Chicken Burgers or Hamburger di Pollo?
Overall, Hamburger di Pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger di Pollo has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburger di Pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.