Comparison

Cappelletti with Parma Ham vs Rustici Capelletti Crudo

Overall, Cappelletti with Parma Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCappelletti with Parma HamRustici Capelletti Crudo
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 241 kcal 287 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 6.5 g
Saturated fat 3 g 2.6 g
Sugars 0.2 g 4.9 g
Salt 0 g 1.3 g
Fiber 1.9 g 2.1 g
Protein 14.2 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has 16% fewer calories (241 kcal vs 287 kcal).
  • Rustici Capelletti Crudo has 14% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has 95% less sugar (0.2 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has no salt, while Rustici Capelletti Crudo has 1.3 g.
  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rustici Capelletti Crudo lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Cappelletti with Parma Ham

Not available.

Rustici Capelletti Crudo

Pasta 65%: farina di grano tenero, uovo 30%, semola di grano duro. Ripieno 35%: carne di suino, pangrattato (farina di grano tenero, acqua, sale, lievito), prosciutto crudo 16% (carne di suino, sale). siero di latte in polvere, aromi naturali, sale, noce moscata, pepe nero. Può contenere frutta a guscio, pesce, crostacei, molluschi, senape, soia, sedano.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cappelletti with Parma Ham or Rustici Capelletti Crudo?

Overall, Cappelletti with Parma Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cappelletti with Parma Ham has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cappelletti with Parma Ham has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons