Comparison

Cappelletti with Parma Ham vs Cappelletti au jambon cru

Overall, Cappelletti with Parma Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCappelletti with Parma HamCappelletti au jambon cru
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 241 kcal 301 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 7.6 g
Saturated fat 3 g 3.1 g
Sugars 0.2 g 5.1 g
Salt 0 g 1.9 g
Fiber 1.9 g —
Protein 14.2 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk, Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has 20% fewer calories (241 kcal vs 301 kcal).
  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has 95% less sugar (0.2 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has no salt, while Cappelletti au jambon cru has 1.9 g.
  • Cappelletti with Parma Ham has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Cappelletti au jambon cru lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Molluscs.

Ingredients

Cappelletti with Parma Ham

Not available.

Cappelletti au jambon cru

Pâte 64% : farine de blé tendre, oeufs 30%, semoule de blé dur. Farce 36%: viande de porc, chapelure (farine de blé tendre, eau, sel, Levure), jambon cru 16% (viande de porc, sel), serum de lait en poudre, arômes naturels (contiennent lait, ble et orge), sel, noix de muscade, poivre noir. Allergenes:voir ingredients en gras. Produit dans une usine qui utilise aussi crustaces, poissons, fruits à coque, céteri et mollusques.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cappelletti with Parma Ham or Cappelletti au jambon cru?

Overall, Cappelletti with Parma Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cappelletti with Parma Ham has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cappelletti with Parma Ham has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons