Comparison

Canneloni vs Placas para canelones tradicionales

Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCanneloniPlacas para canelones tradic...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 354 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 3 g 2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 4 g
Protein 12 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Placas para canelones tradicionales has 33% less sugar (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Placas para canelones tradicionales has 100% more fiber (4 g vs 0 g).
  • Placas para canelones tradicionales is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Canneloni

Hartweizengrieß.

Placas para canelones tradicionales

Sémola de _trigo_ duro, harina de _trigo_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Canneloni or Placas para canelones tradicionales?

Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Canneloni has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Placas para canelones tradicionales has less sugar: 2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons