Comparison

Cannelloni vs Placas para canelones tradicionales

Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCannelloniPlacas para canelones tradic...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 356 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 3 g 2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 4 g
Protein 12 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Placas para canelones tradicionales has 33% less sugar (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Only Placas para canelones tradicionales lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Cannelloni

Not available.

Placas para canelones tradicionales

Sémola de _trigo_ duro, harina de _trigo_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cannelloni or Placas para canelones tradicionales?

Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cannelloni has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Placas para canelones tradicionales has less sugar: 2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons