Cannelloni vs Placas para canelones tradicionales
Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cannelloni | Placas para canelones tradic... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Placas para canelones tradicionales has 33% less sugar (2 g vs 3 g).
- Placas para canelones tradicionales has 32% more fiber (4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Only Placas para canelones tradicionales lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cannelloni
Not available.
Placas para canelones tradicionales
Sémola de _trigo_ duro, harina de _trigo_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cannelloni or Placas para canelones tradicionales?
Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cannelloni has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Placas para canelones tradicionales has less sugar: 2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.