Placas para canelones tradicionales vs Cannelloni tubos precocidos
Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Placas para canelones tradicionales
Cannelloni tubos precocidos
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Placas para canelones tradic... | Cannelloni tubos precocidos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 392 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cannelloni tubos precocidos has 11% fewer calories (350 kcal vs 392 kcal).
- Placas para canelones tradicionales has 27% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Placas para canelones tradicionales has 43% less sugar (2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Placas para canelones tradicionales has 25% more fiber (4 g vs 3 g).
- Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Placas para canelones tradicionales
Sémola de _trigo_ duro, harina de _trigo_.
Cannelloni tubos precocidos
Sémola de _trigo_ duro, agua 12,5%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Placas para canelones tradicionales or Cannelloni tubos precocidos?
Overall, Placas para canelones tradicionales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cannelloni tubos precocidos has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Placas para canelones tradicionales has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.