Cacahuètes grillées à sec vs Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen
Overall, Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cacahuètes grillées à sec | Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 600 kcal | 621 kcal |
| Fat | 47 g | 51 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 6.1 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 10.4 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | Nuts, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cacahuètes grillées à sec has 18% less saturated fat (6.4 g vs 7.8 g).
- Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen has 15% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.1 g).
- Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen has 23% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Cacahuètes grillées à sec has 21% more fiber (10.4 g vs 8.2 g).
- Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Cacahuètes grillées à sec
peanuts (peanuts), salt, rice flour, gelling agent: gum arabic, modified potato starch, stabilizer (sorbitols), yeast extract, powdered onion, dextrose, natural flavor
Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen
Erdnusskerne, Sonnenblumenöl, Speisesalz Kann Schalenfrüchte (Mandeln, Haselnüsse, Walnüsse, Cashewnüsse, Pekannüsse, Paranüsse, Pistazien, Macadamianüsse)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cacahuètes grillées à sec or Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen?
Overall, Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cacahuètes grillées à sec has fewer calories: 600 kcal versus 621 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Erdnüsse geröstet & gesalzen has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.1 g per 100 g.